Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts, or GRATs, present a unique challenge in divorce proceedings as their classification within the marital estate is often complex and dependent on various factors, including the state’s laws, the timing of the trust’s creation, and the source of the assets funding it. A GRAT is an irrevocable trust designed to transfer wealth while minimizing gift and estate taxes, but its very structure—retaining an annuity interest—creates ambiguity when marital property division arises.
What Happens to Assets Transferred Into a GRAT During Marriage?

Generally, assets transferred into a GRAT *during* a marriage are considered marital property, even though legal title may reside within the trust. This is because the transfer typically doesn’t constitute a completed gift for divorce purposes. The grantor retains certain rights—specifically, the right to receive annuity payments—which signifies continued control and ownership for marital property division. Courts often ‘look through’ the trust structure to determine the economic benefit of the assets, assigning a portion of the trust’s value to each spouse. It’s estimated that approximately 30-40% of divorce cases involve disputes over trusts or other complex assets, demonstrating the potential for complications. The value of the GRAT is assessed as of the date of divorce, not the date the trust was created, making accurate valuation crucial.
Can a Spouse Claim a Share of Future GRAT Payments?
This is a particularly contentious issue. While the annuity payments are technically due to the grantor, a court might order a portion of those future payments to be assigned to the other spouse as part of the divorce settlement. This is especially likely if the grantor’s income is insufficient to meet their needs post-divorce. The court could order the grantor to assign their right to receive the annuity payments, effectively diverting a portion of those funds to the ex-spouse. However, this assignment might trigger gift tax implications for the grantor if the assigned payments exceed the annual gift tax exclusion. This is where careful planning is essential. A well-structured GRAT, created and funded well before the marriage, can offer more protection, but even those aren’t immune to scrutiny.
A Story of Unforeseen Complications
I remember working with a client, Daniel, who created a GRAT several years before his marriage. He funded it with stock in a rapidly growing technology company. Years later, his marriage dissolved, and his wife, Sarah, claimed a share of the rapidly appreciating assets held within the GRAT. Daniel assumed, based on the timing of the trust’s creation, that it was separate property. However, Sarah successfully argued that the stock’s appreciation *during* the marriage was marital property, and therefore subject to division. The court ultimately ruled that while the initial assets were separate, the growth attributable to the marital period was divisible. This case highlights the importance of documenting the source of assets and carefully tracking their value throughout the marriage. It also underscored how seemingly separate property can become intertwined with marital property over time.
How Proper Planning Can Protect Your Assets
Another client, Emily, approached us proactively seeking guidance. She had established a GRAT *before* her marriage and ensured the trust document explicitly stated it was intended to be separate property. She diligently tracked the trust’s assets and maintained detailed records demonstrating that no marital funds were used to contribute to it. When her marriage ended, the court readily confirmed that the GRAT was her separate property. The key was not just the timing of the trust’s creation but also the meticulous documentation and maintenance of its separate character. This emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive estate plan, not just a single document, but a proactive strategy to protect your assets.
Ultimately, whether a GRAT is considered part of the marital estate in a divorce is a fact-specific inquiry. While a pre-marital GRAT offers greater protection, proper documentation, consistent tracking of assets, and expert legal counsel are crucial to safeguarding your estate plan. It is essential to remember that state laws vary significantly, and the outcome of any divorce case is unpredictable.
765 N Main St #124, Corona, CA 92878Contact Steven F. Bliss ESQ. at (951) 582-3800 for a consultation to discuss your specific needs and how we can help you protect your estate.










